7starsseeker/dsh-fact-check

dsh-fact-check

事实核查技能:不依赖模型记忆,去公开互联网核实——把论断拆成可独立验证的事实点,先按事实范畴(政策、学术、医疗、金融、灾害事故、食品安全、科学常识、教育考试、体育、娱乐名人、司法案件等)选定该范畴的一手来源阶梯,国内外信息生态并行搜索,抓取一手页面并按来源类型分级,再用质疑关键词反查一轮,最后结论先行地输出报告,每条论断都带完整 URL 与引用位置,「未证实」「无法裁定」与「已证实」分档呈现。三类事实判断在配置了密钥时可交给 TypeSafe Jev(System One)决策模型,未配置则回退到内置的确定性规则;模型的判断只能降档、不能升档。

Uncategorizedcordis-plugindeepseek-harnessdeepseek-harness-plugin

dsh-fact-check

A fact-checking skill for DeepSeek Harness that verifies claims against the open web instead of model
memory — multi-source cross-checking, domestic and international search ecosystems in parallel,
adversarial re-search, and a conclusion-first report where every statement is traceable.

简体中文 → README.zh-CN.md

Table of contents

  • What it is
  • Requirements
  • Install
  • How it works
  • The optional Jev decision layer
  • Verify it yourself
  • Project layout
  • Configuration
  • Contributing
  • License

What it is

A fact-checking skill. Hand it a claim, a rumour, a figure, a news item or a "is this true?" and it returns a verification report. What separates it from asking a model directly is that it is built around five rules it is not allowed to skip:

  1. No model memory. Even if the model "knows" the answer, it must verify by searching the internet

first. If search is unavailable it reports *"cannot verify"* — it never substitutes recollection.

  1. Multi-source cross-checking. Every fact point needs 2–3 mutually *independent* sources. Multiple

outlets reprinting one original report count as one source, not three.

  1. Domestic and international in parallel. The same claim is searched from both ecosystems and both

sides are reported separately, because much information exists on only one side.

  1. Adversarial re-search. Once a conclusion forms, it searches reverse/debunking keywords on purpose.

High confidence is only granted when no counter-evidence is found.

  1. Everything traceable. Every assertion, number, date and quotation carries a full URL, the source

name, and the exact citation position.

The output is a conclusion-first report with a numbered source appendix. Partially verified findings are kept in their own sections — *unverified* and *undecidable* never sit in the same paragraph as *confirmed* — so a guess cannot be quoted as if it were settled.

Requirements

· Required · An agent that can search the public web and fetch page bodies (any one working fetch chain). Without search the skill reports "cannot verify" rather than guessing. Recommended · Batch/multi-engine search, an archive service (Wayback), a sub-agent mechanism for parallel evidence gathering. Optional · Node.js ≥ 18 for the two bundled tools; a TypeSafe Jev key for the decision layer.

The skill body is not bound to any host, product or tool chain: it names *capabilities*, and ADAPTING.md maps them onto your environment.

Verified hosts: DSH 0.1.7-rc.2, 0.2.0-rc.2, 0.2.1-rc.2 and 0.2.1-rc.3. DSH 0.1.7-rc.2 was checked end to end on 2026-09-25 (Node 24.21.0, WSL/Linux): the host discovers the skill and loads its body; the plugin form mounts on the host's own skill registry with source: bundled, its description read from SKILL.md and get() returning that body verbatim; npm run selftest passes (plugin mount 27/27, jev-verdict 25/25, route 37/37); route.mjs regress is 26/26 offline; and the judgement corpora reproduce the expectations in MEASUREMENTS.md §6 — support 37/40, injection 11/12, provenance 15/16, usable_page 12/12, sufficient 24/40 (the last one is the criterion §1 already says not to use on its own). No host version is declared in package.json — engines carries only node, and an exact version there would make the plugin market report "confirmed incompatible" and block every other host — so a host not listed here is untested, not forbidden.

DSH 0.2.0-rc.2 was checked end to end on 2026-09-30 — this time the host *was* upgraded (@deepseek-ai/dsh-desktop-runtime 0.2.0-rc.2, Node 24.12.0, Windows). The directory form is live on it: the running session's own skill catalog lists fact-check, discovered from the host's skill directory by the host's real @deepseek-ai/dsh-skill-filesystem provider. The tools were re-run on that host against the live judgement model: npm run selftest 27/27, 25/25, 37/37; route.mjs regress 26/26; and the judgement corpora, which need a key — support 37/40 (Brier 0.0451), injection 11/12 (0.0369), primary_source 15/16 (0.0487), usable_page 12/12 (0.0031) — all reproducing the MEASUREMENTS.md §6 expectations. The host file implementing the skill registry is byte-identical between 0.1.7-rc.2 and 0.2.0-rc.2, so no code change was needed and none was made. One thing stays where the 2026-09-29 round left it: the plugin form was not mounted on this host — that machine runs the directory form, so the plugin package is not installed there — and its evidence remains the registration check against the host's own published 0.2.0-rc.2 packages, where it mounts on the real @deepseek-ai/dsh-skill 0.2.0-rc.2 registry with its candidate rank equal to the host's exported BUNDLED_SKILL_RANK and get() returning the SKILL.md body verbatim (15/15), and the directory form wins the same-name merge against the bundled copy at rank 400 against 600 (6/6).

DSH 0.2.1-rc.2 was checked end to end on 2026-10-17 (Node 24.21.0, Windows). The registry implementation (@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill's lib/index.js) has no content change between 0.2.0-rc.2 and 0.2.1-rc.2 — the diff is line endings and version metadata only (package.json bumps the peers to cordis ~4.0.5 and adds a ./locale/*.json export) — so no API adaptation was needed. What did change is what a provider may do with control, and this package now uses both 0.2.1 affordances: the candidate carries path (the absolute SKILL.md, retained in catalog summaries), and the provider watches SKILL.md and calls control.invalidate() on save, so editing the body refreshes the session catalog without a restart (150 ms debounce; the watcher is torn down on control.signal abort or context dispose, and a host that passes no control keeps the previous "restart to re-read" behavior). Evidence: the plugin was mounted on the host's own 0.2.1-rc.2 registry code (taken from the shipped asar, wired with the host's own cordis 4.0.5) and on the published 0.2.0-rc.2 package — 21/21 checks on each, snapshot.complete === true, get() returning the body verbatim, provider.list() rank 600, and both edit→refresh cycles observed; npm run selftest 27/27, 25/25, 37/37 and route.mjs regress 26/26 re-run on Node 24.21.0.

DSH 0.2.1-rc.3 was checked on 2026-10-24 (Node 24.22.1, Windows). Nothing in the registry contract moved: @deepseek-ai/dsh-skill 0.2.1-rc.3 still exports BUNDLED_SKILL_RANK (600), SkillRegistry, isSkillName, isModelInvocable and isUserInvocable, still hands registerProvider() the same control ({ signal, invalidate }), and invalidateCache() still advances the cache revision and broadcasts skills/change. The plugin was mounted on that registry — taken from the shipped app.asar, wired with the host's own cordis 4.0.5 — and passed 28/28 checks: inject: ['skills']; the candidate carrying source: bundled, rank 600 equal to the host's own exported constant, the absolute SKILL.md as path, the package root as resourceBase, and the frontmatter description verbatim; get() returning the body (13,533 characters, frontmatter stripped, path retained); control.invalidate() advancing the registry revision 1 → 2 and emitting exactly one skills/change; and disposal removing the provider and aborting control.signal. Two details worth writing down because they look like failures and are not: the host's toSummary() deliberately drops rank from catalog summaries (it is a same-name arbitration input, not a display field), and registration only becomes observable once ctx.plugin()'s thenable resolves — inspected before that await, even a successful mount shows no control. In this same rc3 session the directory form is the one that runs (the host's own skill directory), and the session's skill catalog lists fact-check with this repository's SKILL.md description.

Install

As a DSH plugin

dsh plugin add dsh-fact-check

That is the published npm package — the source the plugin market installs from by preference. The same plugin straight from GitHub source is dsh plugin add github:7starsseeker/dsh-fact-check.

Then restart DSH: the fact-check skill appears in the session catalogue. The plugin itself is a thin adapter — lib/index.js registers the bundled SKILL.md on ctx.skills, re-reading it on every load, so editing the skill needs no code change. It has zero runtime dependencies (only node: builtins). Because the provider registers at the *bundled* rank, a skill you keep in ~/.dsh/skills/fact-check (user rank) still wins on a name collision — installing this will not shadow your own local edits.

Install from a local checkout instead

git clone https://github.com/7starsseeker/dsh-fact-check.git
dsh plugin add ./dsh-fact-check

Handing the folder to any agent

Copy this directory (or a zip of it) to any AI tool and say *"do what FOR-AI.md says"*. It detects the environment offline, adapts itself, and needs no human configuration. Frameworks that load skills take SKILL.md directly (frontmatter included); frameworks that take plain instructions take the generated INSTRUCTIONS.md.

How it works

decompose the claim  →  parallel search (domestic + international + vertical + debunking)
      →  fetch primary pages  →  cross-compare and grade sources  →  adversarial re-search
      →  conclusion-first report: confirmed / unverified / undecidable + numbered sources

Two optional offline tools sit alongside it:

Tool · What it does node tools/route.mjs plan --task "…" · Deterministic planning: which source ladder and which channels this kind of claim needs, plus the failure-action table. A pure data table — no model, no tokens. node tools/jev-verdict.mjs · The judgement client described below.

The optional Jev decision layer

Three judgements are inherently about facts rather than about prose, and the skill can hand them to a TypeSafe Jev (System One) decision model instead of leaving them to unaided reasoning:

Judgement · Question type · When it is asked Does this evidence support the claim? · yes/no + probability · when cross-comparing sources Is this source primary? · yes/no + probability · when grading each candidate source Does this page carry usable body text? · yes/no + probability · after fetching — login walls, captchas and JS shells must not count as evidence

Two things about it are deliberate:

  • It is optional. With no key configured, the same three judgements are made by the deterministic

rules written in SKILL.md; nothing else changes. A key can come from tools/local.json, from the TYPESAFE_API_KEY environment variable, or from tools/jev-verdict.mjs --key-file.

  • A model verdict can only lower a grade, never raise it. The conclusion tier is decided by the

deterministic rule *number of independent sources → tier*; a model saying "the evidence supports this" promotes nothing. Only "insufficient evidence" or "contradicts the evidence" triggers an action.

Measured reliability per judgement, the prompt-injection defences applied before anything reaches the model, and the commands to reproduce the numbers are in MEASUREMENTS.md — including one judgement that is deliberately never asked, because its single-question accuracy measured 62.5%.

Verify it yourself

Every command below runs offline, needs no key, and takes seconds:

node tools/smoke-plugin.mjs                          # is the plugin mounted, and does it serve SKILL.md?
node tools/route.mjs selftest                        # deterministic routing tables
node tools/route.mjs regress --file cases/route-cases-neutral.json
node tools/route.mjs arms                            # dispatch-arm proxy metric (MEASUREMENTS §4.1)
node tools/jev-verdict.mjs selftest                  # judgement layer regression assertions
node tools/doctor.mjs                                # what this machine can and cannot do

node tools/doctor.mjs --net additionally self-tests the fetch chains and the judgement endpoint, and reports which capabilities are missing and how the skill degrades without them. Current status on this checkout: 27/27, 25/25, 37/37 and 26/26 assertions pass.

CI runs exactly these commands on Linux and Windows, on Node 18 and 22, plus one more check: that the generated INSTRUCTIONS.md still matches SKILL.md.

Project layout

Path · What it is SKILL.md · the skill itself — flow and rules (the single source of truth) INSTRUCTIONS.md · generated from SKILL.md for hosts that take plain instructions FOR-AI.md · the task brief for an AI that is handed this package ADAPTING.md · what to change when moving to another environment MEASUREMENTS.md · measured numbers and how to reproduce them CHANGELOG.md · net change between versions RELEASING.md · how a release reaches npm (OIDC, no long-lived token) lib/index.js · DSH plugin entry: exposes SKILL.md on ctx.skills cordis.patch.yml · bundle patch that makes the package installable via dsh plugin add tools/ · two zero-dependency Node scripts, the machine-local config template, and the data tables cases/ · de-identified regression corpora submission/ · the entry file for the plugin-market listing (not part of the package)

Configuration

Machine-specific values — endpoints, keys, which channels actually work on your machine — live in tools/local.json, which is git-ignored and shipped only as tools/local.example.json. No host path, endpoint or key is hard-coded in the code or the data tables, and tools/*.mjs carry assertions that fail if one ever appears.

Contributing

Issues and pull requests are welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md. Two rules are load-bearing: the skill body is the single source of truth (never hand-edit a generated file such as INSTRUCTIONS.md), and any change to the judgement layer or the routing tables must be accompanied by re-run regressions and updated numbers in MEASUREMENTS.md.

License